BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Southesk and Carnegy v Broomhall. [1663] Mor 1806 (12 February 1663) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Mor0501806-002.html Cite as: [1663] Mor 1806 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1663] Mor 1806
Subject_1 BOND OF PRESENTATION.
Date: Earl of Southesk and Carnegy
v.
Broomhall
12 February 1663
Case No.No 2.
A bond of presentation found implemented, tho' the debtor was not produced till a day after the time appointed, which being modica mora, was not regarded, unless the creditor could instruct some detriment by the delay.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Broomhall having taken the Lord Sinclair with caption, Southesk and his son gave bond to produce him to the messengers, or to pay the sum on the third of February, betwixt two and ten; where upon Southesk having re-produced him, craved by supplication his bond up, or to be declared satisfied and extinct.—The defender answered, first, He not being a member, or dependent on the College of Justice, cannot be called thus summarily; especially to declare a bond void, which is in effect a reduction, 2dly, The bond was not performed, in so far as the Lord Sinclair was not re-produced till the 4th es February.— The pursuer answered, That the defender living in Edinburgh, and not compearing, the bill, per modum quærelæ, might be sustained. To the second, it being modica mora of one day, without damage to the defender, and there being trysting amongst the parties all the time betwixt, it was sufficient.
The Lords sustained the petition, and found it extinct.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting