BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Town of Inverness v Forbes. [1663] Mor 13061 (00 November 1663)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Mor3113061-001.html
Cite as: [1663] Mor 13061

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1663] Mor 13061      

Subject_1 PUBLIC BURDEN.

Town of Inverness
v.
Forbes

1663. November .
Case No. No 1.

Who liable for stent. The mode of imposing it.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Town of Inverness having stented John Forbes of Culloden in a certain sum, with the rest of the burgesses, for his burrow lands, within and without burgh, holden burgage; he being charged, suspends upon this reason, among others, That the stent was unjustly imposed; not only as to the proportion, the suspender being burdened far above the rate of his estate, but also in regard, the stent was imposed for defraying some particulars, and paying some debts unwarrantably contracted, and for which the inhabitants and burgesses cannot be liable, not having given any consent thereto. Likeas, the common-good of the burgh being the proper subject, out of which the burgh's burdens should be satisfied, the same is misspended by the Magistrates, who would always take this course to burden the inhabitants, for defraying of burdens contracted by their own misgovernment; and yet the suspender of his own consent, was content to satisfy what is now imposed upon him, there being a rule and order determined for the future, how the inhabitants, especially the suspender, may not be oppressed with such stents. It was answered, That the stent was imposed by sworn men, appointed by the Town Council, who found the cause of the stent just. Replied, That the Magistrates can impose no stent upon the inhabitants without their own consent, and calling them for that effect, unless for such taxes as are appointed and put upon burghs by law.

The Lords found the suspender liable in payment of the stent now imposed, for which he is charged, and that not only as to his lands within burgh, but also as to those lands which hold feu of the Town in respect of his charter, whereby the lands therein specified are feued to him, his heirs and assignees, they being burgesses of the burgh; and, therefore, find the letters raised at the chargers' instance against him orderly proceeded; and find and declare, That in time coming, before any stent or taxation be imposed by the Town Council, that there ought to be public intimation made thereof to the whole burgesses and inhabitants of the Town, by ringing of a bell, or tuck of a drum, and they being convened, the just and necessary cause of the stent ought to be signified to them, and that the common-good is not able to defray the same, being otherways exhausted; and for that effect, that the Town's books be made patent, that thereby it may appear how the common-good is employed; and that the stent masters are to be elected by the Town Council, but their names to be intimated to the whole burgesses and neighbours, that they may be heard to propone any just exception against them, and that the stent roll be made known to all, that every one may know his proportion thereof.

Gilmour, No 92. p. 70.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1663/Mor3113061-001.html