BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Walter Seatoun v Alexander Jack. [1665] Mor 809 (10 January 1665) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1665/Mor0200809-154.html Cite as: [1665] Mor 809 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1665] Mor 809
Subject_1 ARRESTMENT.
Subject_2 Ranking of Arrestments.
Date: Sir Walter Seatoun
v.
Alexander Jack
10 January 1665
Case No.No 154.
A first arrestment preferred, though the decree of furthcoming was a day after another. The first was reckoned a privileged debt, being for custom and excise.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a competition betwixt Sir Walter Seatoun, who was creditor to one Caple, a merchant, for custom and excise, and who had arrested and recovered decreet before the bailies, for making furthcoming, upon the 22d of August 1663: And Alexander Jack, another arrester, and who likewise had recovered decreet, for making furthcoming, upon the 20th August 1663, a day before theo ther.——The Lords, notwithstanding, preferred Sir Walter Seatoun, in regard he had arrested first, albeit his decreet was a day after; and that he had a privilege, in respect of the nature of the debt.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting