BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> A. v B. [1666] Mor 3578 (18 December 1666) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor0903578-030.html Cite as: [1666] Mor 3578 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1666] Mor 3578
Subject_1 DISCUSSION.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Discussion of Heirs.
Subject_3 SECT. VII. Whether an Heir, who has renounced, must be further Discussed.
Date: A
v.
B
18 December 1666
Case No.No 30.
Found in conformity with Cowan against Murray, No 28. p. 3577.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a process against an heir of provision, it was alleged, That the heir of line ought to be first discust; it was replied, That the heir of line was convened and renounced; and it being duplied, That the estate belonging to the heir of line, and whereto he should have right if he were served heir, ought to be discussed,
The Lords found, no process against the heir of provision, until the heir of line was discussed; and that the renunciation of the heir of line was not sufficient; but that the creditor behoved to proceed to adjudication contra hæreditatem jacentem, belonging to the heir of line.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting