BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Taylor v James Knitter. [1666] Mor 9220 (15 June 1666) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor2209220-074.html Cite as: [1666] Mor 9220 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1666] Mor 9220
Subject_1 MUTUAL CONTRACT.
Subject_2 SECT. VII. Possession must be restored at the termination of the Right.
Date: George Taylor
v.
James Knitter
15 June 1666
Case No.No 74.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
George Taylor having apprised some land in Perth, set a tack of a part of it to James Kniter, who thereafter apprised the same. Taylor now pursues a removing against Kniter, who alleged absolvitor, because he had apprised the tenement within year and day of the pursuer, and so had conjunct right with him. It was answered, That he could not invert his master's possession, having taken tack from him. The defender answered, It was no inversion, seeing the pursuer, by act of Parliament, had right to a part, but not to the whole; and the defender did not take assignation to any new debt, but to an old debt, due to his father.
The Lords sustained the defence, he offering the expenses of the composition and apprising, to the first appriser, conform to the act of Parliament.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting