BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Isobel Tosh v David Crookshank. [1666] Mor 12312 (00 July 1666) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor2912312-076.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. III. What Proof relevant to take away Writ.
Isobel Tosh
v.
David Crookshank
1666 .July
Case No.No 76.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Isobel Tosh pursuing reduction of a decreet, pronounced in foro contradictorio, and in præsentia, on this ground, that it was extracted by the clerks unwarrantably, contrary to what was done by the Lords, which they offered to prove by the oaths of the advocates on the other side; it was answered This were a ground to reduce all the Lords decreets in foro.
Yet the Lords sustained the reason to be proved, as said is.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting