BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Eglinton v Laird of Cunninghamehead. [1666] Mor 13092 (27 January 1666) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor3113092-007.html Cite as: [1666] Mor 13092 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1666] Mor 13092
Subject_1 PUBLIC OFFICER.
Date: Earl of Eglinton
v.
Laird of Cunninghamehead
27 January 1666
Case No.No 7.
An inhibition of teinds sufficiently executed by a Sheriff in that part, and not by a messenger.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Eglinton pursues the Laird of Cunninghamehead for the teinds of his lands, conform to a decreet of valuation. The defender alleged absolvitor, because he bruiked by virtue of a tack, at least by tacit relocation, which must defend ay and while the same be interrupted by inhibition or process. It was replied, The pursuer produces inhibition, and craves only the valued duties for the years thereafter. It was answered, The inhibition is directed to messengers
at arms, and is only executed by a Sheriff in that part. It was answered, That it was sufficient, seeing the letters bore messengers, Sheriffs in that part. The Lords found the inhibition sufficient to interrupt the tacit relocation.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting