BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Patoun and Mercer v Patoun. [1666] Mor 15977 (00 June 1666)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor3615977-033.html Cite as:
[1666] Mor 15977
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
John Patoun, as heritor of the mill of Mukart, pursued for the abstracted multures, and alleged, That the mill is the mill of the barony, and the lands a part of the barony, and that they being in immemorial possession of in-town multures, of one peck of the boll, and that, above thirty years ago, there was a decree-arbitral, by the Marquis of Argyle, decerning these multures. The defenders alleged, Absolvitor, because they were infeft before the pursuer's right produced cum molendinis; and as to the act of Court, the whole tenants were not present; and the decree-arbitral, it is under reduction.
The Lords sustained the pursuer's condescendence, reserving the reduction as accords.
