BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Christian Braidie v The Laird of Fairney. [1666] Mor 16994 (20 January 1666)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor3816994-254.html
Cite as: [1666] Mor 16994

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1666] Mor 16994      

Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. X.

Delivery in what Cases necessary?

Christian Braidie
v.
The Laird of Fairney

Date: 20 January 1666
Case No. No. 254.

Evidence of delivery.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Christian Braidie, having pursued a reduction of a disposition, ex capite exhibitionis, against the Laird of Fairney, of all dispositions made by John Glassford to him, after her inhibition, he produced a disposition, holograph, wanting witnesses, of a date anterior. It was alleged, that the holograph writ could not prove its own date, contra tertium.

The Lords, before answer, ordained Fairney to adduce witnesses, and adminicles for astructing the date. He adduced four, the town-clerk, who deponed he dyted the disposition, and a town-officer, who saw it subscribed of the date it bears, and a third, who deponed he saw it subscribed on a market day at Cupar, which, as he remembered, was in March or April 1652, whereas the date bears the first of August 1652; but that Glassford, when he wrote it, laid it down upon the table beside himself, and saw it not delivered; and it being alleged, that the first of August, 1652, fell upon a Sunday;

The Lords considering, that infeftment was not taken upon the disposition for three years, and that there were no witnesses deponed upon the delivery, found the witnesses adduced, not to astruct the date of the disposition, and therefore reduced the same.

Stair, v. 1. p. 340.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1666/Mor3816994-254.html