You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Bonar's Relict v His Representatives. [1675] Mor 2920 (2 July 1675)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1675/Mor0702920-013.html Cite as:
[1675] Mor 2920
Contingent causes ought to proceed together. - After a Fine for Contumacy, the Judge cannot fine a Second time for the Delict.
Bonar's Relict v. His Representatives
Date: 2 July 1675 Case No. No 13.
A cause was advocated, chiefly because there was an improbation depending in the Court of Session, of the same deed which was the subject of the action in the inferior court.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A bill of advocation being reported of a pursuit at the instance of John Bonar's Relict, against his Representatives, before the town of Edinburgh, for payment of 10,000 merks, conform to a bond granted by him, the Lords did advocate, not so much in respect of the importance of the cause, the Town being competent judges; but because there was an improbation depending before the Lords, upon the same pursuit of the said bond: And contingengentia causa non debet dividi; and doth found the Lords' jurisdiction to advocate to themselves all questions concerning the said debt.
