[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Veatch v Pallet. [1676] 1 Brn 754 (20 June 1676) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1676/Brn010754-1732.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR PETER WEDDERBURN, LORD GOSFORD.
Date: Veatch
v.
Pallet
20 June 1676 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the preceding process betwixt these parties, wherein Veatch was donatar to Sanderson's escheat; being preferred to Pallet for the sums contained in his horning, out of the first of the sums contained in Sir George Maxwell's bond, granted to Pallet, who became debtor to him in place of Colonel Stewart, against whom Pallet had got sentence; thereafter it was craved that he might be preferred to the annualrent, as well as the principal sum; seeing, by the Act of Parliament, after denunciation, annualrents are due, albeit the bonds bear none.
It was answered, That the Act of Parliament makes only the debtor himself, who is denounced for not-payment, liable in annualrent; but Pallet being a lawful creditor, and, by his diligence in England, having constituted Colonel Stewart his debtor, and thereafter Sir George Maxwell becoming debtor to him proprio nomine, to punish him who was nowise liable for another's disobedience, was contrary to all law.
The Lords did prefer the donatar, not only to the principal, but to the annualrents. Which seems hard, seeing the reason of the Act could not militate against Pallet, who was never in mora, nor liable.
Page 545.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting