BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Purves v Deans. [1678] Mor 8370 (18 January 1678)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Mor2008370-056.html Cite as:
[1678] Mor 8370
Whether litigiosity bars payment, and other acts of ordinary management.
Purves v. Deans
Date: 18 January 1678 Case No. No 56.
Found in conformity with Veitch against Pallat, No 53. p. 8367.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a competition bewixt Sir William Purves, donatar to the escheat of Francis Aird, and James Deans his creditor, who for a debt anterior to the rebellion had gotten assignation to a share of a ship from Francis, and that before any declarator, therefore he alleged preference, because creditors obtaining payment of their debtors before declarator, are secure against a donatar, as was found after long debate in the case of Veitch and Pallat, and hath been ordinarily sustained since; it was answered, That by the same decision of Veitch and Pallat, it was found, that assignations by rebels for debts before the rebellion obtained before declarator, are not effectual against the donatar, unless the assignee had obtained payment before declarator; and in this case James Deans the assignee hath not obtained payment, nor delivery of saleable goods, but an assignation to a share of a ship, the property whereof was not in the cedent, but in a trustee for the partners' behoof, nor was it delivered, but was sold by commission of the partners, and Francis Aird's part is in the mandatar's hand, who had suspended upon double-poinding.
The Lords preferred the donatar to the assignee, seeing the assignation had not taken effect by payment.
