BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Leitch v Haderwick. [1680] Mor 2077 (10 July 1680) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1680/Mor0502077-010.html Cite as: [1680] Mor 2077 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1680] Mor 2077
Subject_1 CAUTIONER.
Subject_2 SECT. II. In what cases a Cautioner may remain Bound, where the Principal gets Free.
Date: Leitch
v.
Haderwick
10 July 1680
Case No.No 10.
A pactum de non petendo made to the principal, frees not the cautioner.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Leitch of Mousie pursues Mr Andrew Haderwick for repetition of a sum paid by him to.——his cautioner, upon the clause of relief, albeit Mr Andrew had promised never to trouble the principal party; which ought to liberate the cautioner, seeing the principal party thereby was free; which being referred to Mr Andrew's oath, he deponed, that the pursuer having disponed to him his moveables, he promised never to trouble him for his debt, by any distress, real or personal, but with express reservation, ‘that he might distress the cautioner for what he wanted by the disposition of the moveables.’
The Lords found, that the promise not being simply, but with that reservation, ‘that he might distress the cautioner,’ it could not exclude him from distressing the cautioner; yet that he could not assign to him the debt, but leave him to seek his relief by the clause of relief.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting