BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Weddell v George Salmond. [1681] 2 Brn 279 (7 June 1681) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1681/Brn020279-0559.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JAMES DALRYMPLE OF STAIR.
Date: George Weddell
v.
George Salmond
7 June 1681 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
George Weddell, having married his daughter to George Salmond, and paid the tocher, pursues Salmond for repetition of the tocher, because the marriage was dissolved within year and day. The cause was disputed the 25th day of February 1680;—
And the Lords found, That, if the year was complete, and the day after the year begun, the husband should have the tocher; otherwise that it should return to the father. But the point to be proven being so narrow as the precise time of the woman's death, the Lords allowed witnesses, hinc inde, to be examined upon the time of her death; and both men and women were allowed as witnesses ex officio. And being this day advised, it was proven, That the marriage was solemnized upon the 23d day of November, betwixt eleven o'clock and one in the afternoon; and that the woman died upon the 23d day of November, about ten or eleven o'clock at night, in the next year. Whereby the question came, Whether the marriage had stood undissolved for a whole year, and a part of a day after the year, or not. And whether the year was to be reckoned de momento in momentum: so that, the marriage being solemnized about twelve o'clock the 23d day of November, if the wife lived a twelvemonth, viz. 865 days and six hours, and an hour more, it would be sufficient to reckon de momento in momentum; or, whether the reckoning should be calculo rotundo, by the full number of the days of the year in which the marriage and death occurred, without consideration of hours or moments.
The Lords found, That the adjection of a day to the year was to shun the debate of hours or moments; and therefore found, that it being proven that the woman was married the 23d day of November, and died the 23d day of November the next year, there could not be two twenty-thirds of November in one year; and therefore the woman lived one year, and a part of the day of the next year; and so the tocher was found to belong to the husband, and he was assoilyied from repetition.
Vol. II, Page 871.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
