BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Euphame Elphingston v James Cleland. [1685] 3 Brn 565 (14 November 1685)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1685/Brn030565-0851.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1685] 3 Brn 565      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: 14 November 1685

Euphame Elphingston
v.
James Cleland


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The debate between Euphame Elphingston in Gilmerton, and James Cleland, merchant in Edinburgh, is advised, how far he was in tuto to pay a sum contained in a bond to one Geddes and his children, which they were not to uplift without the consent of Alexander Hay. And it being alleged he was dead, and his consent with him, the Lords found his death needed no probation, being notour. And they having led probation, that one of the Geddeses was major, viz. a testificate of his baptism, out of the kirk-session's book, signed by the clerk, with the testimonies of some witnesses, that they knew him these twenty years:

The Lords found this probation not sufficient; but authorised one of his advocates at the bar to be his curator ad hoc particulare negotium, and to consent to his discharge; and assoilyied James Cleland from the penalty.

Vol. I. Page 375.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1685/Brn030565-0851.html