BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sir William Binny v Hope. [1687] Mor 3420 (00 December 1687)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Mor0803420-010.html Cite as:
[1687] Mor 3420
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords repelled the declinator against my Lord Harcarse, that Sir William Binny the pursuer was brother-in-law to my Lord, by marrying his Lady's sister, and was also uncle-in-law to my Lord's Lady, who was then deceased, but had left a child of the marriage behind her; that relation being only affinitas affinitatis, which the act of Parliament extends not to. And the like declinator in another case, against the said Lord Harcarse, that Hugh Wallace and he had married two sisters, was rejected, the Lady being dead. The first declinator was proponed by Sir Thomas Hope of Kerse, and the other by Lord Forrester; the like will hold as to being witness.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 230. Harcarse, (Probation.) No 806. p. 226.
