BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir Peter Fraser v Strachan. [1687] Mor 13802 (00 February 1687)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Mor3213802-035.html
Cite as: [1687] Mor 13802

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1687] Mor 13802      

Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. I.

Who entitled to pursue a Removing.

Sir Peter Fraser
v.
Strachan

1687. February.
Case No. No 35.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a process of removing, at the instance of an heritor against a wadsetter, as not being infeft, it was alleged for the defender, That the pursuer's right is acquired with the burden of the defender's wadset, which the Lords sustained.

Harcarse, (Removing.) No 843. p. 241. *** Sir P. Home reports this case:

1686. December.—Sir Peter Fraser, as being infeft in the barony of Cab perso, which was a part of the Earl of Marshall's estate, upon a disposition from the apprisers, having obtained a decreet of removing before the Sheriff of Kincardine, against Strachan of Glendie, for removing from the lands of Glendie, which are a part of the said barony; whereupon being charged, he suspended, upon this reason, That the decreet was null, and that the suspender could not be obliged to remove, because the pursuer's disposition from the apprisers did bear an express reservation of the suspender's right. Answered, That the suspender's right being only but a personal disposition, from the Earl of Marishall, whereupon no infeftment has followed, it could not defend against the removing, albeit that right was reserved in the charger's disposition, which reservation can only import that the charger should have recourse of warrandice against his author, but not validitate the suspender's right, so as to make it preferable to the charger's right, The Lords sustained the defence, viz. that the charger's right bears a reservation of the suspender's wadset, and finds the same proved by the right produced, and therefore suspended the letters simpliciter.

Sir P. Home, MS. v. 2. No 835.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1687/Mor3213802-035.html