[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Ellies of Stanhopmills v Anthony Haig of Bymerside. [1693] 4 Brn 40 (5 January 1693) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Brn040040-0087.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: James Ellies of Stanhopmills
v.
Anthony Haig of Bymerside
5 January 1693 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr. James Ellies of Stanhopmills, against Anthony Haig of Bymerside. The Lords found an allegeance against a clear liquid bond, especially being now assigned, could not be proven, but only scripto et juramento; and did not allow of Mr. William Nimmo, the creditor's declaration, that it was for a disposition of annuity which was never given, and so causa data causa non secuta; and found that Nimmo being now broken, this could not militate against Mr. Ellies, his assignee.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting