BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Mary Brown v Henderson of Brignies, and his Tutor. [1693] Mor 12535 (1 December 1693) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1693/Mor2912535-421.html Cite as: [1693] Mor 12535 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1693] Mor 12535
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Public Instrument, how far Probative.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Decrees, Acts of Court, &c.
Date: Mary Brown
v.
Henderson of Brignies, and his Tutor
1 December 1693
Case No.No 421.
The clerk, of an inferior court's assertion of an alleged consent of a party or his procurator, extraneous to the ordinary steps of process, not probative.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mary Brown against Henderson of Brignies, and his tutor; the Lords found, in the general, that a clerk of an inferior court's assertion, that a party or his procurator consented to do such a thing, was not binding nor obligatory on them, unless their consent were otherwise instructed, and that they had subscribed it, and that the Judges subscribing the decreets now with the clerk, by the act 3d, of Parliament 1686, did not alter the case; yet here, in this circumstantiate affair, the Lords found the decreet probative of their consent to a roup of the land the next year, seeing she had passed from her two defences, on this concession, viz. that the minor was not infeft, and the tutor had not made inventory; which she would not otherwise have done, and that they had homologated the decreet; for though in extraneous points, the acts of clerks of Courts are not to make faith, yet in actibus officii et processus credendum est clerico; as if a party or his procurator declare he passes from such a conclusion of his libel, and insists only for the remanent hoc loco, such declarations and
restrictions need not be subscribed. Vide 24th July 1661, Puchannan and Osburn, No 411. p. 12528; but there it was a making up a consent ex intervallo on the reminiscence of the Judge and clerk.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting