[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Naysmith v The Tenants of Whitslaid and William Montgomery. [1694] 4 Brn 183 (5 July 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040183-0411.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: James Naysmith
v.
The Tenants of Whitslaid and William Montgomery
5 July 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
James Naysmith, pursuing the Tenants of Whitslaid, and William Montgomery, on a general service, as heir to his mother;—it was objected,—That it was not a sufficient active title to carry the right of the adjudication, because there was infeftment passed thereupon. Answered,—He passed from the infeftment; and, in that case, there was no doubt but the general service was sufficient. The Lords found he could not divide them, seeing there was infeftment actually taken; and which could not be conveyed but by a special service.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting