[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Innes v Innes of Auchluncart. [1695] Mor 11219 (31 December 1695) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1695/Mor2711219-392.html Cite as: [1695] Mor 11219 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1695] Mor 11219
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION XIII. Contra non valentem non currit Prsæcriptio.
Subject_3 SECT. VI. The effect of Prescription cannot be obtained by a person against himself.
Date: Innes
v.
Innes of Auchluncart
31 December 1695
Case No.No 392.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The investitures of an estate, standing in favour of heirs whatsomever, the proprietor, anno 1641, executed a bond of entail, in favour of heirs-male. From this period, the heirs-male continued to be the same with the heirs whatsomever, till the 1692, that they came to split; and then the heir-male claimed the estate upon the said bond of tailzie. The Lords sustained the defence of the positive prescription, there being a connected series of services, in favour of heirs of line, standing together for 40 years since the date of the bond, which established the right of the heirs of line.
*** This case is No 386. p. 11212.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting