BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Blair v Stirling of Glorat. [1697] 4 Brn 350 (2 January 1697) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1697/Brn040350-0739.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Blair
v.
Stirling of Glorat
2 January 1697 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords advised the probation, in the pursuit betwixt Blair, late minister at Ruglen, and Stirling of Glorat, who was convened to pay a debt of his father's, on missive letters, promising to take course with it if he would forbear executing a caption he had taken out against him; and Glorat pretending he was minor when he wrote them, and had revoked them, being to his plain lesion,—the Lords allowed a conjunct probation, the one to prove minority, the other majority, at the time of the writing; which was advised this day. Both of them proved; but, after balancing the testimonies, they found the probation of the majority much more pregnant, being adminiculated by the kirk-session books; and which, though not authentic, yet were also confirmed by the depositions of witnesses astructing the same; and there were presumptions against
Glorat's witnesses, asserting his minority, that it looked like a premeditated tale which had been taught them, and wanted not suspicion of prevarication: and the Lords modified large expenses against Glorat.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting