BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Wright, Petitioner. [1701] Mor 7429 (19 June 1701)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1701/Mor1807429-146.html Cite as:
[1701] Mor 7429
A factor on a burdened estate asked advice of the Court relative to his management, Refused.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mr Robert Wright, factor to the estate of Bruce of Kennet, gave in a bill, representing, that, by the tenants' late delivery of their farm bear, the prices were fallen, so that he could not win to the Sheriff of Clackmannan's fiar (within which shire the lands lay), which was L. 8 Scots, and therefore craved the Lords' warrant to sell it at the best avail, as the markets now rule. This was to get it allowed when he came to fit his accompts; but the Lords thought it not regular to give him any directions in the matter, but left him to his own method; and this course they also take in setting of lands, as in the case of Meik of Leidcassy, who, by bill, shewed that he had 15 bolls of bear, 3 bolls of oats, some turses of straw and capons, as a feu-duty payable to him yearly out of the kirk-lands of Coupar's Grange; and that Souter and Crockat, the heritors, being either dead or bankrupt, the lands had lien lea these two years bygone, none offering to meddle with them; and seeing not only he, but the minister's stipend, and King's cess, and other creditors, were all disappointed by this course, therefore he craved a factor might be put in to set or labour the lands, that their debts might not perish; the Lords considered, if they had not adjudged already, they might do it, and then, by their own right and authority, they might put in a factor; and therefore refused the bill. Likeas, when factors cannot get lands set to the full avail to what it paid formerly, the Lords refuse to interpose their authority, because it is frequently sought with no other design but to give down the rental, that at the roup it may be sold at an unworth to the prejudice of the posterior creditors; and so they are left to act in these things as rational provident men would do, as they will be answerable on their peril.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 499. Fountainhall, v. 2. p. 114.
