BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Janet Stark and David Tam, her Husband, v George Jolly, Writer in Edinburgh. [1713] Mor 9830 (22 January 1713) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1713/Mor2309830-153.html Cite as: [1713] Mor 9830 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1713] Mor 9830
Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV. Vitious Intromission.
Subject_3 SECT. I. In which circumstances intromission does or does not infer a Passive Title. - Action transmits against heirs in valorem only.
Date: Janet Stark and David Tam, her Husband,
v.
George Jolly, Writer in Edinburgh
22 January 1713
Case No.No 153.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a process at the instance of Janet Stark and her husband against George Jolly, the Lords found the defender's intromission with L. 7:10s. Scots being so small a sum, and but one single act, not relevant to infer vitious intromission.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting