BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Janet Stark and David Tam, her Husband, v George Jolly, Writer in Edinburgh. [1713] Mor 9830 (22 January 1713)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1713/Mor2309830-153.html
Cite as: [1713] Mor 9830

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1713] Mor 9830      

Subject_1 PASSIVE TITLE.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV.

Vitious Intromission.
Subject_3 SECT. I.

In which circumstances intromission does or does not infer a Passive Title. - Action transmits against heirs in valorem only.

Janet Stark and David Tam, her Husband,
v.
George Jolly, Writer in Edinburgh

Date: 22 January 1713
Case No. No 153.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a process at the instance of Janet Stark and her husband against George Jolly, the Lords found the defender's intromission with L. 7:10s. Scots being so small a sum, and but one single act, not relevant to infer vitious intromission.

Forbes, p. 649.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1713/Mor2309830-153.html