BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Pollock v Campbell of Calder. [1718] Mor 9489 (8 February 1718) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1718/Mor2309489-033.html Cite as: [1718] Mor 9489 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1718] Mor 9489
Subject_1 PACTUM ILLICITUM.
Subject_2 SECT. VI. Pactum contra Fidem Tabularum Nuptialium.
Date: Pollock
v.
Campbell of Calder
8 February 1718
Case No.No 33.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir Hugh Campbell of Calder, in his son Sir Alexander's marriage articles, became bound to provide his estate to his son and the heirs-male of the marriage “free of all charge and burden;” having reserved no power to provide younger children. He, at the same time, privately elicited from his son a promise to grant him a faculty of burdening the estate with L. 2000 Sterling to his younger children; which promise, Sir Alexander fulfilled about two years after the marriage, upon the narrative of the said promise, and that the marriage articles had been entered into in compliance with the bride's friends and lawyers, that there might be no stop of the marriage. Sir Hugh having exercised this faculty granted him by his son; in a pursuit against the heirs of the marriage, for payment of this sum, the Lords found, that the particular communing betwixt Sir Hugh and Sir Alexander before the marriage was in fraudem pactorum nuptialium; and seeing the bond was granted by Sir Alexander, though posterior to the marriage, on the narrative of the said prior communing, and that the marriage articles were only made and granted by Sir Hugh in compliance with the bride and her friends; therefore, that the said bond was not binding on the heir-male of the marriage. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting