BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Magistrates of Hamilton v Duke of Hamilton. [1726] Mor 10777 (4 February 1726)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1726/Mor2610777-074.html Cite as:
[1726] Mor 10777
What Subjects may be carried by the Positive Prescription.
Magistrates of Hamilton v. Duke of Hamilton
Date: 4 February 1726 Case No. No 74.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The town of Hamilton was crected into a royal burgh, by a charter from Queen Mary, 1548, giving them power to chuse their own Magistrates, &c.— This charter, as it would seem, having been neglected, the town afterwards, in the year 1670, accepted of a charter from the family of Hamilton, erecting it into a burgh of regality, with a power to the Duke of Hamilton to create Magistrates, admit burgesses, &c. as in other such burghs. In consequence of this charter, the family of Hamilton continued to exercise the privileges and powers of Lords of Regality upwards of 40 years, till a declarator of their privileges, as a royal burgh, was raised, and insisted in by the town; and they pleaded, That the privileges of a royal burgh, as being juris publici, can neither be lost by the negative or positive prescription; the Lords sustained the prescription in favour of the Duck, as to the way and manner of the election of the Magistrates and Town Council of the burgh. See Appendix.
