BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Bell v Southerland. [1728] Mor 8985 (00 January 1728) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1728/Mor218985-106.html Cite as: [1728] Mor 8985 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1728] Mor 8985
Subject_1 MINOR.
Subject_2 SECT. VI. Deeds in minority when ipso jure null, when requiring a restitutio in integrum.
Bell
v.
Southerland
1728 .January .
Case No.No 106.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A minor in familia with his father, having attested a cautioner in a suspension, without his father's concurrence, and being pursued for the debt, proponed this defence, that his deed was ipso jure null. It was answered, That deeds by minors, without their fathers' consent as administrator, are not ipso jure null, but need reduction, and now the quadriennium utile is past without any challenge made to the obligation. The Lords found the deed ipso jure null. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting