BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Craig v Grant. [1732] Mor 9035 (5 July 1732) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1732/Mor2209035-169.html Cite as: [1732] Mor 9035 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1732] Mor 9035
Subject_1 MINOR.
Subject_2 SECT. X. No Restitution till the other Party be restored. - Whether a Minor, who follows a Profession, can be restored?
Date: Craig
v.
Grant
5 July 1732
Case No.No. 169.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A bill being challenged as granted in minority, the Lords found it relevant to sustain the bill, that the acceptor was bred a wright, and was trading at the time of accepting it. For drawing and accepting of bills of exchange is of itself a branch of trade. The money must be presumed advanced in artis suæ vel mercaturæ exercitio. If this presumption be not sustained, a minor merchant cannot deal otherwise than by ready money, which, in effect, is saying, a minor cannot be a merchant. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting