BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir A. Cockburn v Sir W. Cockburn, &c. [1744] 1 Elchies 384 (14 December 1744)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1744/Elchies010384-013.html
Cite as: [1744] 1 Elchies 384

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1744] 1 Elchies 384      

Subject_1 PUBLIC OFFICER.

Sir A Cockburn
v.
Sir W Cockburn, &c.

1744, Dec. 14.
Case No. No. 13.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The question was, Whether the office of King's Usher, or as it is called in writings Ostiarius, to which there is annexed a salary of L.200 sterling, which seems to have been in place of maintenance or living due to them for their attendants by the original grants, whether that office be adjudgable or affectable by creditors, and whether a judicial sale of it can be pursued by the creditors? After two hours reasoning it carried that this office was and is adjudgable. Pro were Justice-Clerk, Minto, Drummore, Haining, Dun, Balmerino, Monzie, and Tinwald. Con. were Kilkerran, President, Murkle, Leven, Arniston, et ego. Strichen did not vote.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1744/Elchies010384-013.html