 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Walker v Walker. [1744] 2 Elchies 272 (7 December 1744) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1744/Elchies020272-005.html Cite as: [1744] 2 Elchies 272 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1744] 2 Elchies 272
Subject_1 IMPLIED WILL.
Date: Walker
v.
Walker
7 December 1744
Case No.No. 5.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Substitution of the legatar's children was thought implied;—and therefore Robert Walker having disponed his effects to William Walker, and in case of his death without children, ordered him to pay certain sums to different persons, and inter alios to Mary and Janet Walker, without adding their heirs or assignees; these died before William, but left issue: The Lords found a substitution to their children implied.
See Wallace against Dickie, 8th February 1734, voce Presumption.
See Notes.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting