BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Agnes Moodie v Ann Moodie. [1745] 1 Elchies 252 (5 July 1745) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1745/Elchies010252-007.html Cite as: [1745] 1 Elchies 252 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1745] 1 Elchies 252
Subject_1 LOCUS PŒNITENTIÆ.
Agnes Moodie
v.
Ann Moodie
1745 ,July 5 .
Case No.No. 7.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Three heirs-portioners intending to sell their lands, for the more easy distribution of the price, agreed that it should be set up to roup among the three so as one of them might still retain the lands; and the second and third made a private bargain that the second should not offer at the roup, but allow the lands to fall into the hands of the youngest, and a definite sum was pactioned to be paid by the youngest if she was purchaser to the second, whether the lands should sell higher or lower. Thereafter articles of roup were made out and signed by all the three without reference to this private bargain. And the youngest became purchaser at the roup. But then the second repented of the bargain and insisted for her full share of the price offered, and contended that as it was a bargain
about a sale of lands there was locus pœnitentiæ, since no writ intervened upon the bargain, which was offered to be proved only by her oath, and secondly that that verbal bargain Was altered by the subsequent articles of roup,—though without them it could not have been executed; but the Lords unanimously found no locus pœnitentiæ.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting