BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Muirhead v The Town of Haddington. [1750] Mor 532 (22 June 1750)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1750/Mor0200532-070.html
Cite as: [1750] Mor 532

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1750] Mor 532      

Subject_1 ANNUALRENT.
Subject_2 ANNUALRENT due to CAUTIONERS, FACTORS, MANDATARS, TUTORS, &c.
Subject_3 As a Recompence for advancing their own Money upon their Constiuent's Account.

Muirhead
v.
The Town of Haddington

Date: 22 June 1750
Case No. No 70.

Interest refused to the executor of a writer, from the date of the last article of an account of business and debursements, or even from citation.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Muirhead of Brodisholm, as executor to his deceased brother George, writer in Edinburgh, recovered decree against the Town of Haddington for L. 1142 : 18 : 8 Scots, contained in an account due by the Town to the defunct, as their agent in several processes, and which had been due since the year 1731; and, as the account consisted all of debursements, except ten guineas modified for pains, he insisted also for annualrent from the last article of the account; or, if not found entitled to that from the time the account had been transmitted to the Town, at least from the citation in the process, which he argued to be due upon the same principle that mandatories and factors, advancing their money on commission, are entitled to annualrent from the time they transmit the account.

The Lords sound no annualrent due: They considered such claim as only competent in the case of merchants, and that it had never gone further.

Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 30. Kilkerran, (Annualrent.) p. 30.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1750/Mor0200532-070.html