BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> - - v Minister of Areskine. [1754] 5 Brn 812 (27 February 1754) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1754/Brn050812-0987.html |
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. Collected By JAMES BURNETT, LORD MONBODDO.
Date: - -
v.
Minister of Areskine
27 February 1754 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The patron of this parish pursued a modification and locality of the stipend of this parish, which was a parsonage, and the minister in possession of the greatest part of the benefice.
The Lord President declared his opinion, that if it had not been a parsonage, the patron would have had no title to pursue a modification and locality, because in that case he would have had right to the tithes by the act 1690, and might have laid hold of them and kept them, leaving the minister to get a stipend modified for himself, so that he had no interest to pursue a modification; whereas by the act 1693, if the benefice is a parsonage, the minister is entitled to retain the tithes till he get a modified stipend, and therefore the patron has an interest to pursue for such modified stipend, that he may have the remainder of the tithes to himself; but he said he did not think that the minister, as parson, being in possession of the benefice was any reason for modifying to him a greater stipend than ordinary.
Lord Drummore was of opinion that the patron of any parish was entitled to pursue a process of modification, that he might know what belonged to him after deduction of the minister's stipend.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting