BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Glass v Magistrates of St Andrews. [1754] 1 Elchies 85 (27 February 1754) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1754/Elchies010085-040.html Cite as: [1754] 1 Elchies 85 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1754] 1 Elchies 85
Subject_1 BURGH ROYAL.
Glass
v.
Magistrates of St Andrews
1754 ,Feb. 27 .
Case No.No. 40.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Glass and others presented a complaint 18th December that the Magistrates of St Andrews after finishing the several steps of the annual election whereof the last was 8th October last, three of the Councillors declining to accept, at a private meeting where only 15 or 16 were present without giving notice to the other Councillors what they were to do, chose three new Councillors not of the Old Council agreeable to the set, but of Guild-Brethren who had not been in Council. Answered, 1st, Not competent because the remedy provided by the act 16th Geo. II. concerns only annual elections, and must be brought in two calendar months. 2dly, Not relevant, because after the annual election is over, the filling up of vacancies by death or otherwise is an act of ordinary administration, and may be done quandocunque. We all agreed that it was not competent because the complaint was not within two months of the last step by the set of the annual election, and accordingly found it not competent; and the Court seemed also clear that it was not relevant, but of that I had some doubt, for I thought there was a difference betwixt a vacancy by death or by deprivation, and the case of the person elected his not accepting; for if acceptance is necessary the election is not completed till he accepts, in the same way as if one incapable were chosen; but we did not determine that point.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting