BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Subject_1 MEMBER of PARLIAMENT. Subject_2 DIVISION III.
The Qualification of Freeholders possessing Lands liable in Public Burden for L. 400 Scots.
Subject_3 SECT. V.
How a division of Valuation may be set aside. - Every Party interested in a division ought to be made a Party to it. - Erroneous division.
Cuningham v. Stirling
Date: 9 January 1754 Case No. No 73.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
This objection to a division of valuation was sustained, that it was made at a meeting not regularly called, although the original valuation of the county was not extant; on which ground it was argued, That there was no proper evidence of a cumulo valuation, the cess-books being said to be insufficient to prove that point.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 412. Fac. Col.
*** This case is No 7. p. 2438, Voce Commissioners of Supply.
