BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Wright v Mary Graham, his Mother-in-law. [1766] Mor 375 (22 November 1766)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1766/Mor0100375-020.html
Cite as: [1766] Mor 375

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1766] Mor 375      

Subject_1 ADVOCATION.

William Wright
v.
Mary Graham, his Mother-in-law

Date: 22 November 1766
Case No. No 20.

Advocation competent after decree, if before extract. See No 7.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

It being objected to the competency of an advocation, that the process was finished before the Sheriff by a decree; and, therefore, that a suspension was the only competent remedy: The objection was repelled upon the ground of utility, an advocation being a more easy remedy than a suspension, and equally susceptible of being remitted with an instruction. An extract indeed must bar advocation, because after extract the cause cannot be remitted.

Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 20. Select Dec. No 250. p. 322.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1766/Mor0100375-020.html