BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Scott v Beaton [1834] CA 13_89 (26 November 1834)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1834/013SS0089.html
Cite as: [1834] CA 13_89

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Shaw_Court_of_Session

Page: 89

Scott

v.

Beaton
No. 26.

Court of Session

1st Division

Nov. 26 1834

Scott,     Pursner.— Robertson. Beaton and Others,     Defenders.— Curinghame.

Subject_Expenses—Jury Trial.—

Circumstances in which the Court found expenses due to a pursuer who had claimed £500 damages, and obtained a verdict for £5, reserving power to modify the expenses, if this seemed proper, after the account should be taxed.

Question as to the expenses of a jury trial, held on circuit before; Lord Moncreiff, who now sat in the Inner House to assist in disposing of the pursuer's motion for expenses. The damages had been laid at £500, partly for alleged real and special damage, and partly for injury to credit. It was said that, at the opening of the trial, the case was given up as to special damage, although a record had been made up with a view to that claim. The jury found £5 of damages. Lord Monereiff considered, that in all the circumstances, expenses were generally due to the pursuer, though they ought to be modified. The other Judges concurred, and found expenses due, reserving to modify them, if it seemed proper, after the account was taxed.

SS 13 SS 89 1834


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1834/013SS0089.html