BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> E. of Dunmore v Dickson [1834] CA 13_116 (2 December 1834)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1834/013SS0116.html
Cite as: [1834] CA 13_116

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Shaw_Court_of_Session

Page: 116

E. of Dunmore

v.

Dickson
No. 41.

Court of Session

1st Division

Dec. 2 1834

Lord President

Earl of Dunmore,     Petitioner.— Sol.-Gen. Skene— Tait. Walter Dickson (Common Agent in the Ranking and Sale of Harris),     Respondent.— Anderson.

Subject_Judicial Sale—Consignation.—

Though consignation of the price of lands, bought at a judicial sale, has been made in the Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, which is a chartered bank, the Court will not declare the purchaser exonered of the price, in respect that the bankrupt act specifies the Royal Bank, the Bank of Scotland, or the British Linen Company Bank, as those in which consignation, to the effect of exoneration, shall be made.

On 5th March, 1834, the Earl of Dunmore purchased the estate of Harris, under a process of ranking and sale, for £60,200. His Lordship gave notice to Walter Dickson, W.S., the common-agent, of his intention to consign the price at Martinmas, 1834, in the Commercial Banking Company of Scotland, and was informed by Dickson that this appeared to be irregular, as the bankrupt statute only allowed consignation in the Royal Bank, Bank of Scotland, or British Linen Company, as the condition of exonerating the purchaser at a judicial sale. Lord Dunmore replied, that the Commercial was now a chartered bank, and that consignations there were in common use; and his Lordship consigned the price in that bank, and applied to the Court to have the consignation approved of, and his exoneration declared. Dickson lodged answers, stating that he did not object to the credit of the Commercial Bank, but the creditors had instructed him to oppose the petition, as the consignation was not in terms of the statute.

Lord President.—There is no question raised here as to the comparative credit of the Commercial and other banks. But the statute which regulates consignation has specified three banks by name, and declared that, if consignation be made in any of these, the purchaser shall be discharged of the price. The Commercial Bank is not one of these three, and, although it may be a chartered bank, the Court have not power, under the statute, to discharge the purchaser upon consignation being made in that bank. The petition must therefore be refused. The other Judges concurred, and

The Court refused the petition.

Solicitors: Tait and Young, W.S.— W. Dickson, W.S.—Agents.

SS 13 SS 116 1834


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1834/013SS0116.html