BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Rose v Trustees [1835] CA 13_964b (23 June 1835)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1835/013SS0964b.html
Cite as: [1835] CA 13_964b

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Shaw_Court_of_Session

Page: 964

Rose

v.

Trustees
No. 292.

Court of Session

2d Division

June 23 1835

Hugh Rose,     Pursuer.— Rutherfurd— Neaves. M'leay's Trustees,     Defenders— D. F. Hope— A. M'neill.

Subject_Expenses — Auditor's Report. —

By the ultimate interlocutor in this cause (ante, VIII. 1037), the defenders were found, generally, entitled to expenses. An accountant's report was subsequently given in; and both parties having reclaimed against the Lord Ordinary's judgment, disposing of their objections to the report, the Court (7th March, 1833) altered the interlocutor, to a certain extent, in favour of the defenders, and remitted to his Lordship to proceed accordingly, with full power to hear parties, and to decide all claims as to expenses.

The defenders reclaimed (31st January, 1834) from an interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary, to which the Court adhered, and “found the pursuers entitled to the expenses of this discussion, subject to modification.” The auditor, in his report on the accounts of expenses, allowed to the pursuers the expense of the proceedings in the Outer-House between the remit in 1833 and the reclaiming note in 1834. To this part of the report an objection was stated and sustained; the Court declaring that, in finding the pursuer entitled to “the expenses of this discussion,” they did not mean their finding to include the previous expenses in the Outer-House.

Solicitors: D. Cleohorn, W.S— Gordon and Scuart, W.S—Agents.

SS 13 SS 964 1835


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1835/013SS0964b.html