BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Patten's Trustees v. Campbell's Executors [1867] ScotLR 3_176 (24 January 1867) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1867/03SLR0176.html Cite as: [1867] SLR 3_176, [1867] ScotLR 3_176 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 176↓
(Before
Held by Lord Kinloch that agents are entitled to exercise a certain discretion in regard to the amount of counsel's fees, and that the auditor should interfere only when that discretion was abused.
In taxing the pursuers' account of expenses in this case, the auditor of Court deducted £1, 1s. from a fee of £3, 3s. paid to counsel to revise summons; £1, 1s. from a fee of £3, 3s. paid to revise condescendence; £1, 1s. from a fee of £2, 2s. paid to adjust record; £1, 1s. from a fee of £4,48. paid to debate; and £2, 2s. from a fee of £6, 6s. paid to senior counsel to debate.
The pursuers objected to the auditor's report, and the Lord Ordinary sustained the objections. His Lordship observed that agents were entitled to exercise a certain discretion as to the fees to be paid to counsel in each particular case, and it was only when that discretion was abused that it was the province of the auditor to interfere. That was not the case in the present instance.
Counsel for pursuers— Mr N. C. Campbell. Agent— John Forrester, W.S.
Counsel for Defenders— Mr Adam. Agents— Adam, Kirk, & Robertson, W.S.
