BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Leith Police Commissioners v. Campbell [1867] ScotLR 3_192_2 (2 February 1867)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1867/03SLR0192_2.html
Cite as: [1867] ScotLR 3_192_2, [1867] SLR 3_192_2

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 192

Court of Session Outer House Second Division.

Saturday, Feb. 2 1867.

3 SLR 192_2

Leith Police Commissioners

v.

Campbell.

Subject_1Expenses
Subject_2Taxation
Subject_3Counsel's Fees.
Facts:

A case having been three days debated in the Inner House, and two refreshers sent to counsel, one of them struck off by the Court.

Headnote:

In this case in the defender's account of expenses

Page: 193

there were charged, as fees to counsel for debate, six guineas for the senior and four guineas for the junior. The auditor in taxing struck a guinea off each fee. Fees were charged for the second day of the debate of four and three guineas, for the third day of five and three guineas, and for the advising of three and two guineas. The auditor allowed only three guineas to the senior for each continuation and two to the junior. He also struck a guinea off the fee sent to senior counsel for the advising.

The defender objected to the auditor's report, and, after hearing counsel, the Court took time to consider the matter.

To-day, judgment was delivered by

Judgment:

The Lord Justice-Clerk—The Court considered this matter delicate, and thought it right to take time to consider it; and although we are always very unwilling to interfere in regard to such a matter as the amount of counsel's fee, we are bound, when a question is brought before us, to dispose of it. The fees sent for debate were six guineas to senior counsel, and four to the junior. We think these fees are perfectly reasonable. But we must take into account what follows. After the debate began on a Thursday it was resumed next day, and for that continuation of the debate four guineas were sent to senior counsel, and three to the junior. That also we should not, under ordinary circumstances, be inclined to interfere with. Then it appears that the discussion was to be resumed on the following Tuesday, and on Monday five guineas more were sent to senior counsel and three to the junior. We think these are fees which should not be allowed as betwixt party and party. As to the fees of three and two guineas sent for the advising, we think these are reasonable. The result is, that we are of opinion that eight guineas should be disallowed as betwixt party and party, and it so happens that that is just the sum which the auditor has by another process taxed off the account. We shall therefore, for the sake of simplicity, just approve of his report, but, at the same time, it must distinctly understood that we do not approve of the cheese-paring plan which the auditor has resorted to for the purpose of reducing the aggregate amount of the fees charged.

Counsel:

Counsel for Pursuers—The Solicitor-General. Agent— William Mitchell, S.S.C.

Counsel for Defender— Mr Pattison. Agents— J. A. Campbell & Lamond, W.S.

1867


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1867/03SLR0192_2.html