BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Morton v. Gordon, Johnston, and Davidson [1867] ScotLR 3_294 (11 March 1867) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1867/03SLR0294.html Cite as: [1867] ScotLR 3_294, [1867] SLR 3_294 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 294↓
(Before
Held that a conviction obtained upon a complaint at the instance of the Procurator-Fiscal could be enforced after he had vacated office.
The suspender was convicted in November 1865, at the instance of Mr Johnston, the Procurator Fiscal of the Justice of Peace Court of the Stewartry of Kirkcudbright under the Day Poaching Act, 2 and 3 Will. IV., c. 68. The warrant of imprisonment in the conviction (failing payment of the penalty and costs) was put in force in January 1867. Morton presented a note of suspension and liberation on the grounds (1) that Mr Johnston had never authorised the apprehension and imprisonment; and (2) that the parish minister, to whom the penalty in the conviction was ordered to be paid, being now dead, there was no one in existence to whom the penalty could be paid so as to satisfy the conviction. Mr Johnston ceased to act as Fiscal in 1866. The parties called in addition to Mr Johnston as respondents were Gordon, on whose grounds the trespass was committed, and Davidson, as Chief Constable of the Stewartry, who, as was alleged, had instructed the enforcing of the sentence.
The Court refused the suspension, holding that it was to be presumed that the delay in enforcing the warrant arose from Morton not having been found until now; that the sentence here being a criminal sentence, the prosecutor had no option, when once it was pronounced, of enforcing or not enforcing it; and that the superintendent of police had a right to enforce the warrant against the suspender.
Counsel for Suspender— Mr Pattison. Agent— James Somerville, S.S.C.
Counsel for Respondent Gordon—The Solicitor-General ( Millar) and Mr A. Blair. Agents— Hunter, Blair, & Cowan, W.S.
Counsel for Johnston— Mr Charles Scott. Agent— W. S. Stuart, S.S.C.