BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Suspension - Kay v. Local Authority of Kelso [1876] ScotLR 13_609 (30 June 1876)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1876/13SLR0609.html
Cite as: [1876] ScotLR 13_609, [1876] SLR 13_609

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 609

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Friday, June 30. 1876.

13 SLR 609

Suspension—Kay

v.

Local Authority of Kelso.

Subject_1Public Health (Scotland) Act 1867
Subject_2Summary Prosecutions Appeals (Scotland) Act, 1875 sec. 9
Subject_3Conviction
Subject_4Appeal.
Facts:

The 9th section of the Summary Prosecutions Appeals (Scotland) Act 1875, provides that “any person who shall appeal under the provisions of this Act from any determination of an inferior judge from which he is by law entitled to appeal in any other manner of way to any superior or other court, shall be taken to have abandoned such title to appeal in any such other manner of way as aforesaid.”

Headnote:

A person convicted of an offence under the Public Health Act 1867, applied to the Sheriff to state a Case for appeal under the provisions of the Summary Prosecutions Act 1875, section 9, but before the case was signed withdrew from the prosecution of his appeal under that Act.— Held that the appeal was not taken till the Case was signed, and that in the circumstances appeal in another way was competent.

The suspender, who is a farmer, was convicted, along with his landlord, by the Sheriff of a contravention of the Public Health (Scotland) Act 1867. The appellant and the landlord both applied to the Sheriff to state a Case under the provisions of the Summary Prosecutions Appeals (Scotland) Act 1875. Caution was found, and the Case was prepared and submitted to the parties, but before it was adjusted and signed the tenant withdrew from the further prosecution of his appeal under that Act. The landlord insisted in his appeal, and the judgment of the Sheriff was reversed. The tenant then brought the present suspension.

Argued for the respondent— The suspension is incompetent. By section 9 of the Summary Prosecutions Appeals (Scotland) Act it is provided, that “any person who shall appeal under the provisions of this Act from any determination of an inferior judge from which he is by law entitled to appeal in any other manner of way to any superior or other court, shall be taken to have abandoned such title to appeal in any such other manner of way as aforesaid.” Here the suspender took an appeal by applying to the Sheriff to state a Case, and he cannot by withdrawing his appeal by minute renew his right to suspond.

Page: 610

Review is also excluded by section 108 of the Public Health (Scotland) Act. The suspender has lain bye for four months, until he saw the result of the landlord's appeal, and has so disentitled himself to suspend.

At advising—

Judgment:

Lord Justice-Clerk— I think we must give a liberal interpretation to the clause which cuts off the common law remedies. I do not think we can give so stringent a construction to it as to hold that the preparing of the Case amounts to an appeal being taken.

Lord young—I concur. The respondent's argument is strict to inadmissibility. There is nothing in the Act to prevent a party reconsidering his position after he has required the judge to state a Case, and if he thinks proper withdrawing from the prosecution of his intended appeal. The Court might prevent him abandoning his appeal at a time when to do so would be injurious to his antagonist; but we have no such case here.

Lord Craighill concurred.

Counsel then proceeded to argue the remaining questions, but ultimately consideration of the case was superseded by the Court until October.

Counsel:

Counsel for Suspender— Moncrieff.

Counsel for Respondent— Balfour

1876


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1876/13SLR0609.html