 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Dalgleish v. Dalgleish [1878] ScotLR 15_383_1 (21 February 1878) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1878/15SLR0383_1.html Cite as: [1878] SLR 15_383_1, [1878] ScotLR 15_383_1 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 383↓
[
A raised an action of divorce for adultery against his wife. The defence was a denial of the adultery, and also condonation. The Lord Ordinary found the adultery proved, and pronounced decree of divorce. On a reclaiming note for the defender, in which the only defence relied on was that of condonation, the Court affirmed the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor without calling for a reply from the pursuer.— Held, in an application by the defender for her expenses in the Inner House, that the defender having shown no probable grounds for reclaiming, this was a proper case for following the rule laid down in Kirk v. Kirk, November 12, 1875, 3 R. 128, and that therefore the defender was not entitled to her expenses.
Counsel for Pursuer (Respondent)— Brand. Agents— J. & A. Hastie, S.S.C.
Counsel for Defender (Reclaimer)— Lang. Agent— R. A. Veitch, S.S.C.