BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA057892013 [2013] UKAITUR AA057892013 (13 December 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/AA057892013.html Cite as: [2013] UKAITUR AA57892013, [2013] UKAITUR AA057892013 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/05789/2013
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
| Heard at Field House | Determination Promulgated |
| On 23 October 2013 |
|
|
| ………………………………… |
Before
THE PRESIDENT, THE HON MR JUSTICE MCCLOSKEY
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER
Between
MR SRIRAM THIRUVAMPALAMAYAM
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation:
Appellant: Mr Derana, Liyon Legal Ltd
Respondent: Mr Cooper, Home Office Presenting Officer
DETERMINATION
1. Very properly, there is no objection on behalf of the Respondent, the Secretary of State of the Home Department, to an order of this Tribunal setting aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal as erroneous in law and we so order. The operative error of law consists of the judge’s failure to properly consider the medical evidence.
2. Secondly, we exercise our power under rule 15 of the Procedural Rules to admit the fresh evidence contained in the Appellant’s bundle.
3. Having taking into account the significant alteration in the framework and content of the Appellant’s case, the nature and impact of the error of law and the Practice Statement, we have determined that as regards the remaking of the decision it would be more appropriate to remit the appeal to the First- tier Tribunal. Accordingly we remit the matter to a differently constituted First-tier Tribunal.
4. We give no procedural directions, leaving this to the First-tier Tribunal.
Decision
5. We set aside the determination of the First-tier Tribunal and allow the appeal to the extent of remitting the matter to that forum for the purpose of remaking the decision.
Signed : Date: 5 December 2013
Mr Justice McCloskey
The President
