BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA276632012 [2013] UKAITUR IA276632012 (3 October 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/IA276632012.html
Cite as: [2013] UKAITUR IA276632012

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


     

    Upper Tribunal

    (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/27663/2012

     

     

    THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

     

     

    Heard at Glasgow

    Determination promulgated

    on 2 October 2013

    On 3 October 2013

     

     

     

     

    Before

    Mr C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT

    UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

     

    Between

     

    ERIKA ROSE SILVERMAN

    Appellant

    and

     

    THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

     

     

    Respondent

     

     

     

    For the Appellant: Mrs J Moore, of Drummond Miller, Solicitors

    For the Respondent: Mr A Mullen, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

     

     

    DETERMINATION AND REASONS

     

     

    1.      The appellant appeals against a determination by First-tier Tribunal Judge Callow, dismissing her appeal against refusal of a tier 4 application under the Points Based System (PBS).

     

    2.      The appeal was decided “on the papers” in the First-tier Tribunal. It failed because it was thought that the appellant needed to provide a letter from her parents confirming their relationship and their consent to use of funds.

     

    3.      The Presenting Officer observed that this stemmed from a misunderstanding of the legal requirements, brought about by the appellant not filling in correctly parts L22 - L24 of the application form. In fact, she was a “low risk student” who was not required to produce documentation of this nature with her application. He fairly and correctly said that the decision should be reversed.

     

    4.      The determination of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside. The appeal, as brought by the appellant to the First-tier Tribunal, is allowed.

     

    5.      No order for anonymity has been requested or made. No fee award has been requested or made.

     

     

    2 October 2013

    Judge of the Upper Tribunal

     

     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/IA276632012.html