BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> VA351542012 & VA351552012 [2013] UKAITUR VA351542012 (31 July 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/VA351542012.html
Cite as: [2013] UKAITUR VA351542012

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


    Appeal Numbers:

    VA 35154 2012

    VA 35155 2012

    Upper Tribunal

    (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

    THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

     

    Heard at Sheldon Court

     

    On 29 July 2013

    On 31 July 2013

     

     

     

    Before

     

    UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS

    DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE M A HALL

     

     

    Between

     

    ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER - LAGOS

    Appellant

    and

     

    JULIET EKENNA OKEY UHEGWU

    OKECHUKWU UWADIEGWU UHEGWU

    Respondent

    Representation:

    For the Appellant: Dr N Uhegwu for the appellants

    For the Respondent: Mr N Smart, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

    DETERMINATION

    1.       The respondents to this appeal (hereinafter “the claimants”) appealed successfully to the first tier tribunal a decision of the present appellant (hereinafter “the Entry Clearance Officer) to refuse them entry clearance as family visitors.

    2.       The Entry Clearance Officer was given permission to appeal because the First-tier Tribunal thought, wrongly, that it was arguable that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeals. For reasons that are not clear permission to appeal was granted in both appeals although the Entry Clearance Officer only challenged one of the decisions.

    3.       Before us Mr Smart recognised that the application for permission to appeal was misconceived and the Entry Clearance Officer’s case is unarguable. Both claimants are within the narrow band of relatives who, at the material time, could still appeal decisions to refuse them leave to enter as visitors.

    4.       In the premises we dismiss both of the appeals by the Entry Clearance Officer that are before us.

    5.       For the avoidance of doubt both claimants have shown that they satisfy the rules for admission to the United Kingdom as visitors and should be allowed to enter the United Kingdom in accordance with the First-tier Tribunal’s findings.

     

    Signed

     

    Jonathan Perkins

    Judge of the Upper Tribunal

     

    Dated 30 July 2013

     

     

     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/VA351542012.html