![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA050722014 [2014] UKAITUR AA050722014 (31 October 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/AA050722014.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR AA50722014, [2014] UKAITUR AA050722014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-FH-NL-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/05072/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House | Decision and Reasons |
On 29 October 2014 | Promulgated |
| On 29 October 2014 |
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DAVIDGE
Between
ms
(anonymity order previously made)
Appellant
And
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Ms V Easty, Counsel instructed by Brighton Housing Trust
For the Respondent: Ms R Pettersen, Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
NOTICE OF APPELLANT’S WITHDRAWAL OF HER CASE
1. At the hearing before me Ms Pettersen sought to withdraw all of the grounds of challenge set out in the grounds of the application for permission to appeal on the basis that the challenges set out therein were not sustainable.
2. Ms Easty indicated that she did not object to the withdrawal.
3. The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 as in force on 20 October 2014 and following, set out at Rule 17 that a party may orally withdraw at the hearing but that notice of withdrawal will not take effect unless the Upper Tribunal consents, save in relation to the withdrawal of an application for permission to appeal.
4. In light of the circumstances above I consented to the withdrawal.
5. Following the withdrawal of the appellant’s case the determination of the First-tier Tribunal allowing the appellant’s appeal stands.
Signed E DAVIDGE Date 30 October 2014
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Davidge