 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> DA004112014 [2014] UKAITUR DA004112014 (12 December 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/DA004112014.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR DA004112014, [2014] UKAITUR DA4112014 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00411/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
| Field House | Determination Promulgated |
| 11th December 2014 | 12th December 2014 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE COKER
Between
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
And
JORAM THUO
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr N Bramble, senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr N Lawrence, counsel instructed by IMK solicitors
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. Upper Tribunal Judge C Lane held, in a determination promulgated following a hearing on 23rd September 2014 that the First-tier Tribunal judge had erred in law in dismissing an appeal against the decision to remove the appellant. Judge Lane directed that the matter be adjourned to a resumed hearing at which he expected to hear full argument on Article 8. No findings by the First-tier Tribunal were retained.
2. Due to unforeseen circumstances the resumed hearing has been significantly delayed and as a result the respondent and his partner require to give evidence and submit further documentary evidence. It is also evident that since the coming into force of s117 of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 and s54A Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, further evidence may be required.
3. Accordingly it was agreed by the parties that it was appropriate and in line with the Practice Statement dated 25th September 2012 of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal that this matter should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for hearing de novo.
Conclusions:
I remit this appeal to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard de novo.
Consequential Directions
To be listed for hearing by the First-tier Tribunal.
No findings preserved.
2 hours.
No interpreter.
2 witnesses.
Not before Judge A.D. Smith MBE. TD.
Date 11th December 2014
Upper Tribunal Judge Coker