 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA146682013 [2014] UKAITUR IA146682013 (11 April 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA146682013.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA146682013 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/14668/2013
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
| Considered at : Field House | Determination Promulgated |
| On : 25 March 2014 | On : 11 April 2014 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KEBEDE
Between
Olasoji Olajide Atolagbe
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. In a decision made on 6 January 2014 Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Rimington set aside the First-tier Tribunal’s decision of 9 August 2013 allowing the appellant’s appeal against the respondent’s decision to refuse to issue him with a residence card under the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2006 and directed that the decision be re-made in the Upper Tribunal at a resumed hearing.
2. In a letter dated 13 February 2014 the appellant’s legal representatives advised the Upper Tribunal that the appellant wished to withdraw his appeal. In response, the Upper Tribunal issued directions on 17 February 2014 giving its consent to the withdrawal by the appellant of his case before it, pursuant to rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 and proposing, in the absence of any objection, to treat the respondent’s decision to refuse to issue the residence card as unchallenged.
4. In the absence of any objection to that proposal, the Upper Tribunal treats as unchallenged the respondent’s decision to refuse to issue the appellant with a residence card. The appellant’s appeal before the Upper Tribunal is accordingly dismissed.
DECISION
5. The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved an error on a point of law and has been set aside. The decision is re-made by dismissing the appeal.
Signed Date
Upper Tribunal Judge Kebede